Consider COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, the official journal of the Community Development Society as both a publication venue for your work and a great way of keeping up with the exciting field of community development. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT is a peer-reviewed journal that is published five times a year, featuring articles on such diverse topics as rural and urban economic development, housing, entrepreneurship, theory, technology, social capital, leadership, and much more! Articles are written by and for academics and practitioners. For more information on preparing your manuscript, visit the journal’s webpage at: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcod20/current. Full instructions are available there, including author guidelines. All manuscripts are submitted via an electronic system at the Scholar One Manuscripts website, https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rcod.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT articles are abstracted by the following services:
Current Index to Journals and Education (C.I.J.E.), Educational Resource Information Center (ERIC), Journal of Planning Literature, PAIS Bulletin, PAIS International, Social Planning/Policy and Development Abstracts, Social Work Research and Abstracts, Sociofile, Sociological Abstracts, Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory, International Regional Science Review
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT publishes with Routledge, Taylor & Francis!
To purchase a previous copy of the journal, follow this link:
Selected articles and table of contents can be viewed by going to the Routledge, Taylor and Francis site, and clicking on contents in the right sidebar.
MEMBERS: Access to the online journal can be found on the CDS members only homepage. Please log on using your CDS username and password. If you are currently logged in, please go to the USER MENU on the left of your screen; click on Welcome! which will bring you back to the CDS members only homepage.
Call for Abstracts
Business Retention & Expansion
Special Issue of Community Development
(Journal of the Community Development Society)
Michael Darger, University of Minnesota Extension
Alan Barefield, Mississippi State University
Brent Hales, University of Minnesota Extension
Business Retention and Expansion (BRE) has existed as a central activity and priority for economic development practitioners for more than a generation. A wide variety of public and private organizations in communities, regions and states/ provinces in North America and beyond have incorporated BRE programming into their community economic development programs. A 2009 national survey found that 62% of cities and counties were doing BRE surveys with their businesses and 82% were partnering with chambers of commerce or others on BRE (N=709). Business Retention and Expansion International (BREI) has existed as a BRE-specific association for over 20 years in order to promote best practices and build capacity through quality educational opportunities. The International Economic Development Council (IEDC) also offers BRE training and finds that “business retention programs have become the most popular economic development efforts of communities nation-wide”. [i] There is an opportunity to explore the collective impact of BRE and share what has been learned about this important component of community economic development.
Despite its emergence as a pre-eminent concern for community development practitioners, relatively little has been published in recent literature. What innovation is happening in BRE visitation programs? How do other data gathering methods contribute to economic developers’ understanding of the businesses and economics in their sphere of influence? What are the results at the community, regional and state/provincial levels? How does BRE intersect with economic development techniques and strategies?
Seeking to build on advances in community economic development strategies, we are soliciting abstracts for papers to be published in a special issue of Community Development in 2017. The intent of this special issue is to provide a collection of high quality articles on various aspects of using this approach to inform and induce economic development with a goal of helping readers to learn about innovative procedures and approaches in conducting a BRE process. While BRE might be regarded as relatively mature with regard to a developmental continuum, both scholars and practitioners can make significant contributions to the literature by sharing research and practices from case studies, process evaluations, larger scale studies, and analysis of benchmarked data time series.
Submission of topics and abstracts is open and topics of special interest include, but are not limited to:
· Intersection between BRE and other economic development strategies: entrepreneurship, business recruitment, technology-intensive, creative economy, etc.
· Public policy implications of BRE from local to state/provincial scale
· Measuring BRE results: metrics and methods
· Case studies of BRE results over time
· Benchmarking BRE data for trends and program development.
· Implications of face-to-face visitation vs. other primary data collection methods like focus groups, electronic surveying, mixed methods, and other techniques
· Accomplishing relationship building with businesses
· Quality data collection while using technology: considerations and tradeoffs
· Innovations and evolution in data collection from secondary sources
· Moving from BRE data analysis to systemic action
· Building broad-based partnerships for BRE
· The process of BRE in its various forms (volunteer visitor, continuous, electronic survey, etc.). What are the implications for urban, suburban, rural, regional, and state/provincial BRE programs
· Using volunteer visitors vs. professional economic developers for BRE program implementation
· BRE training and capacity building for economic development professionals, board members and volunteer participants.
· Retaining baby boomer businesses in communities as the boomers transition to retirement
The abstracts should be written for both practitioners and academics and provide generalizable results that can contribute to the body of knowledge on Business Retention and Expansion rather than, for example, only reporting a case study. However local experiences can document the findings or test the results. The final accepted papers will be written in a professional style including literature review, documented outcomes and references. The emphasis should focus on the manner in which the BRE effort was applied, essential ingredients in success, what has been learned from the process, and outcomes and impacts achieved.
When submitting, include BUSINESS RETENTION AND EXPANSION ABSTRACT in the memo subject line. Authors will be notified by March 1, 2016 regarding invitations to prepare a full paper.
Final paper submission will be expected by July 15, 2016 using standard Community Development format requirements. Papers will be submitted through the usual refereeing process.
It is expected that an economic development topic will be offered in the 2016 Community Development Society (CDS) International Association of Community Development (IACD) conference and authors are encouraged to submit their paper to the conference call for presentations as well. However, conference submission is not required. An invitation to prepare a full paper for the Journal does not imply invitation to a presentation opportunity at the conference, nor vice versa. However, both the Journal and the CDS IACD conference are excellent opportunities to advance knowledge on BRE .
Updated: November 11, 2015
 Warner, Mildred and Zheng, Lingwen (2011). Economic Development Strategies for Recessionary Times: Survey Results from 2009. ICMA Municipal Year Book 2011 (Washington, D.C.: ICMA, 2011), 33-42.
[i] Retrieved from http://www.iedconline.org/clientuploads/Downloads/IEDC_ED_Reference_Guide.pdf
BOOKS FOR REVIEW
Dear CDS Colleagues...
Anne H. Silvis
Book Review Editor, Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT is pleased to include the CD Cases section in the journal. One to three applied case studies will be presented in each CD Cases offering. The purpose of this section is to provide a venue for publishing peer reviewed case study research that provides useful information for community development researchers and practitioners and insights into applied community development work.
To submit a manuscript for consideration in CD Cases, visit http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rcod . All manuscripts must be formatted in accordance with American Psychological Style (APA) guidelines and to specifications listed on the website. Note that manuscripts must not be longer than 25 pages, double-spaced.
A case study involves in-depth research and understanding on a given or chosen subject matter. A typical manuscript would include these components: introduction, literature review, methodology, study, analysis, conclusions and recommendations, and references. The journal does not accept manuscripts that are purely descriptive – the research must be generalizable and provide relevant insight/implications/findings for the field of community development. The case study methodology must be fully explained and supporting literature must be presented. The journal does not usually accept economic impact studies unless new methodologies are utilized. Note that all manuscripts for CD Cases will be peer reviewed.
Information on the Reviewing Process and Scheduling
The timeframe for the reviewing process can take up to six months, or longer. Once the manuscript is submitted, it is processed internally and an initial decision is made whether or not to place in the review process. If accepted for review, then reviewers are identified who have expertise and interest in the topic of the manuscript. The process of identifying and securing an affirmative response from potential reviewers can take several weeks or longer. Once the reviewer has agreed, they have 30 days to submit. Sometimes, a reviewer will agree and find they do not have time to submit the review; in this case, we have to identify and find a new reviewer and this may result in some delay. Once all reviews are returned, the editor assesses them and makes the final decision. Therefore, a decision cannot be returned within 30 days to you. We strive for an efficient process, but do allow us time to complete a thorough and comprehensive review of your manuscript. If your manuscript requires revision, you will have up to six months to resubmit online or the system will time it out. It does not always take this long, unless major revisions or a review resubmission is required. After the final manuscript is received, it will be sent to production and assignment to an issue. You will receive a proof copy a month or so before printing date. Prior to print date, most articles will be available via the iFirst system, an online manuscript access system that allows use earlier than usual.
JOURNAL ABSTRACTS ARCHIVES
More abstracts coming soon, become a member to access full articles.
John J. Green, University of Mississippi, USA
Mark A. Brennan, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
Book Review Editor
Anne H. Silvis, University of Illinois, USA
Book Series Editors
Rhonda Phillips, Purdue University, USA
Paul Lachapelle, Montana State University, USA
Elizabeth Sweeney, University of Mississippi, USA
Mary Margaret Saulters, University of Mississippi, USA
Lynn C. Woo, University of Mississippi, USA
Alan W. Barton,New Mexico Highlands University, USA
Robert Boyer, University of North Carolina Charlotte, USA
Caitlin Cahill, Pratt Institute, USA
James R. Calvin, Johns Hopkins University, USA
Gary Craig, Durham University, UK
Brian Christens, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
Steven Dellar, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
Mary R. Domahidy, St. Louis University, USA
Mary Emery, South Dakota State University, USA
Jan Flora, Iowa State University, USA
Tony Gauvin, University of Maine at Fort Kent, USA
Gary A. Goreham, North Dakota State University, USA
Gisele Hamm, Western Illinois University, USA
Stephen C. Jeanetta, University of Missouri, USA
Katie Kerstetter, George Mason University, USA
Paul Lachapelle, Montana State University, USA
David Lamie, Clemson University, USA
Wilson Majee, University of Missouri, USA
Diane K. McLaughlin, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
Douglas D. Perkins, Vanderbilt University, USA
Molly Phillips, Dreyfus Health Foundation of the Rogosin Institute, USA
Rhonda Phillips, Arizona State University, USA
Keith Popple, London South Bank University, UK
Katie Richards-Schuster, University of Michigan, USA
Norman Walzer, Northern Illinois University, USA